Since my interview with Mr Stephen Nolan on BBC’s Radio 5 on March 15, and reaction hitherto, I have thought about
how best to convey my sincerest and unreserved apology for remarks that
came across as insensitive to children who have suffered, and continue
to do so, at the hands of paedophiles.
Let me first put it on record that the Roman
Catholic Church condemns the abuse of children, women and other
marginalised groups of society in the strongest possible way.
The interview that came on the back of Pope
Francis’s election was initially supposed to have been about the
conclave, our new pope and challenges facing the Catholic Church, and I was more than happy to take part.
Its focus, however, quickly became the sexual abuse of children within the church, an issue I did not mind addressing.
Mr Nolan pressed on about my views on
paedophilia, and the line of answering that I took was one that tried to
examine a holistic approach to understanding the complexity of this
type of abuse and crime.
That is, while supporting and protecting the
abused as best as possible, we as a society also need to examine the
systemic causes thereof, which might include casting a long glance at
the abuser as the abused.
I answered as best as I could, within the
parameters of that medium, and repeatedly qualified my response with the
fact that I was not an expert.
I strongly felt that in our discussion we needed to consider both the criminal and psychological aspects of this abhorrent act.
My intention was never to put the abuser first,
nor in any way raise their status. To do so would seek to undermine and
perhaps even negate the devastation and heartache with which victims
live.
I could not have imagined the backlash that
followed the interview, and in hindsight I realise that I could have
expressed myself better on the matter.
Comments I made during my conversation with Mr
Nolan were both unfortunate and regrettable and I wish to reiterate the
fact that they do not reflect those of the church.
I believe that they were read in isolation and
outside of the context I have tried to provide above, vis-à-vis what I
refer to as a holistic approach.
Allow me to expand on the thought.
During the conversation, and in the limited
time that I had, I tried to open up the conversation to include the
psychological aspect of this horrendous act, which the church believes
must be dealt with according to the requirements of both civil and canon
law.
There is no way that I could have tried to either defend this scourge or make excuses for the perpetrators.
In revisiting the conversation, it unfortunately came across in that way.
I wish to add that during the interview, I
tried in vain to explain that the priority of pastoral concern is, and
must always be, with the victim.
Paedophilia is a sick, despicable and
punishable criminal act. There can be no shying away from its
criminality and the need for perpetrators to face the full might of the
law.
The church has, in the past, come under severe
criticism for its silence on the issue of sexual abuse within its own
parameters.
We, as the Southern African Catholic Bishops’
Conference (SACBC), have over the years tried to tear off this veil of
silence by putting in place a protocol that outlines exactly how
allegations of abuse are handled.
A professional conduct committee that published
the protocols for dealing with abuse, to which all the clergy and
church workers in the region of the SACBC are to adhere to, was set up.
As the church, and society at large, we need to make a concerted effort to protect the rights of our children.
According to the 2011 Census, children in
South Africa make up nearly 34 percent of the population. If we do not
all come together as a society to protect the welfare of this vulnerable
group, who will? The responsibility around issues of inequality,
poverty, abuse in all its forms, has to fall squarely on all our
shoulders.
Let us take this moment to reflect on the
status of children across the world; not only in relation to sexual criminal acts, but in all areas.
I was particularly saddened that this gross
misunderstanding came on the back of an auspicious and significant milestone in the life of the Roman Catholic Church, the election of Pope
Francis.
Once again, I wish to convey my heartfelt
apology to all those who have suffered at the hands of paedophiles; I in
no way ever meant to place the perpetrator’s rights and concerns over
those of the victim, who is always the innocent child.
* Cardinal Napier is Archbishop of Durban.
Zie Thomas Doyle vs Diarmuid Martin RTÉ
Marie Collins Rome, Towards Healing
Zie Thomas Doyle vs Diarmuid Martin RTÉ
Marie Collins Rome, Towards Healing
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten