KLIK |
8:00 AM Gerry O'Hanlon SJ 24-5-2012
“How would I inquire of a priest what his sexual behaviour was if it hadn’t emerged in the public forum? I inhabit the external forum. Where the problems emerge in the external forum, I act. The difficulty is how to gain access to the internal forum, and to know that which is hidden.”
It
is important to note the figure only represents those who have
come forward and reported their abuse to some 90-odd Catholic
authorities.
The
rule of thumb for police investigators like those from VicPol’s
Sano Task Force, is for every victim who comes forward, at least
four will not.
There
are those victims who cannot come forward, who are deceased, their
lives often ended by suicide or in a storm of recklessness.
There
are others who won’t ever come forward. They may a feel a victim’s
shame at the abuse they have suffered. More often they appreciate
coming forward will come at significant personal cost, the
prospect of family dislocation, the ugly business of clerical
sexual abuse meeting religious clannishness.
What
we can safely say is the real numbers of victims is much higher
than the 4444 figure. We will never know the exact extent of it
but a speculative figure somewhere north of 20,000 victims of
clerical paedophilia since World War II is not an unreasonable
one.
This
was an epidemic of criminality and one wonders what moral
authority the Roman Catholic Church in Australia has left.
For
those who argue the Catholic Church acted in much the same way any
number of institutions did, the truly damning statistic is, based
on convictions and offences committed, a Catholic cleric is four
times more likely to sexually abuse a child than a member of the
general public.
But
this level of abuse, culturally embedded within the clergy, could
not have occurred in a vacuum.
In
1972 Victoria Police stymied a legitimate investigation into the
paedophile priest, Monsignor John Day. Day was a degenerate, a
thief, a conman and an active [...]"
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten