 |
| klik |
6 A. Cardinal, I understand
that you're available again on
7 Wednesday; is that right?
8 A. Certainly.
9
10 Q. 10 o'clock
in
the morning?
6281
6354
6354
maandag, maart 24, 2014
zondag, maart 23, 2014
Hoofdredacteur rorate, nu kennelijk zónder (onafhankelijk) redactie statuut
Mooie zin natuurlijken als PR lokkertje ook heel zinvol zo onder de ANBI collecte-bak
Conclussie:
het stinkt er nog steeds! En ze hebben kennelijk een hoofdredacteur gevonden die er niet vies van is zonder voorbehoud tov. een bestuur dat zich gedurende meer dan 10 jaar ruim heeft laten zien als zijnde volstrekt in strijd met andere fraaie blabla als
Het forum is bedoeld als een plek waar op respectvolle en open wijze meningen kunnen worden uitgewisseld, m.b.t. het Rooms-Katholieke geloof en de Rooms-Katholieke Kerk, algemeen christelijke en algemeen religieuze interesse velden. (forumregel 1)
Moderatoren
Erik Goris
e.a. hiertoe ingeschakeld te worden.
van de naam RKK bedienend clubjeVlaamse/Ned marginalen welke dankzij de in overdaad gedemonstreerde stompzinnigheid gepaard gaande met manipulatie, dreiging, haat(zaaierij) en geweld gezien kan worden als beledigend tov de RKK of welke vorm van Christendom dan ook.
Een zich van de naam RKK bedienend clubje Ned/Vlaams marginalen met kennelijk te weinig volgers op hun twitter account nu met een nieuwe hoofdredacteur.
U bent gewaarschuwd!
Mocht je zelf over je (onder)buik wensen te beschikken
Hier past de vaart der volkeren nog op een bierviltje
zodat ook een leek een idee kan krijgen waar eventueel een A-4 tje zou kunnen liggen
the media embody many virtues, but also many sins. With regard to the latter,
the three most significant are those which “take the road of lies: …
disinformation, slander and defamation.
Groetjes uit Rome
zaterdag, maart 22, 2014
vrijdag, maart 21, 2014
donderdag, maart 20, 2014
de oude jacob's pasen en pinksteren spring 's in the air
LewisBlayse.net
20-3-2014
“We would like to re-archive your publication periodically to record significant additions and changes.”
20-3-2014
One of my father’s many objectives in starting this blog was for it to become something of a historical resource to future researchers attempting to make sense of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse and related matters. That desire influenced his research efforts and helped motivate him to write as carefully and as often as he did.
It is a source of great frustration to me that I have dropped the ball in the sense that I have not been posting daily or even weekly on coverage of the very important things that have been happening at the Royal Commission and elsewhere, not least of which have been the Parramatta/Hay hearings and the Ellis Defence hearings.
These will have to be covered retrospectively when I have the opportunity to do so. My current difficulties in life and my necessary preoccupation with matters such as the upcoming Case Study 10 hearings into the Salvation Army have had to take precedence.
Nevertheless, I am heartened by a recent decision of the National Library of Australia to digitally archive this blog in a project called the PANDORA archive.
This archive is described as follows:
“PANDORA, Australia's Web Archive, is a growing collection of Australian online publications, established initially by the National Library of Australia in 1996, and now built in collaboration with nine other Australian libraries and cultural collecting organisations.”
“The name, PANDORA, is an acronym that encapsulates our mission: Preserving and Accessing Networked Documentary Resources of Australia.”
“The PANDORA Archive is a selective collection of web publications and websites relating to Australia and Australians. It includes materials that document the cultural, social, political life and activities of the Australian community and intellectual and expressive activities of Australians.”
“PANDORA is a selective archive. The National Library and its partners do not attempt to collect all Australian online publications and web sites, but select those that they consider are of significance and to have long-term research value.”
“The full text of archived content in indexed and selected titles are catalogued and included in the National Bibliographic Database. Both the full-text index and catalogue records are searchable through the Library's national single search discover service (Trove).
“The PANDORA collection can be browsed through subject and alphabetical listings on the PANDORA Home Page.”
The National Library of Australia has informed me that by including www.lewisblayse.net in the PANDORA archive:
“The Library will catalogue your publications and add the records to the National Bibliographic Database (a database of catalogue records shared by over 5,200 Australian libraries), as well as to our own online catalogue. This will increase awareness of your publications among researchers using libraries.”
Furthermore, the archiving will occur periodically, meaning that as more is added to the site, that too will be archived. As the National Library of Australia has said to me:
“We would like to re-archive your publication periodically to record significant additions and changes.”The person who made this possible and who actually made the approach to the National Library of Australia (I didn’t even know about PANDORA) has indicated a preference to remain anonymous, but I would like to quote something of what she said to the National Library of Australia when she approached them with a request for the site to be incorporated into the PANDORA archive. She said:
“I consider the work of Mr Lewis Blayse in his blog to be a body of work of national importance at this time in our history, it’s living history with a superb future historical research capacity.”
I’ve thanked this person privately, but thank her again here. My father would have been very pleased at this development given his original objective with the blog.
I also extend my thanks to the National Library of Australia, and Russell Latham at the library, for making the decision to archive the blog.
Aletha Blayse
dinsdag, maart 18, 2014
maandag, maart 17, 2014
donderdag, maart 13, 2014
Its a patato;
11-3-2014
Francis Sullivan
TJHC
The tears rolled down John Ellis’ face as he recounted the abuse he suffered as an altar boy in Bass Hill in Sydney in the mid 1970s. At the second Royal Commission hearing concerning Towards Healing in Sydney this week, Mr Ellis explained how his misery continued as he attempted, but failed, to sue the Church for justice.
Listening to Mr Ellis speak of his suffering and loss was distressing. It may be of small consolation to him, but his battle has played no small part in prompting the announcement this week of a major reform proposal within the Catholic Church.
The reform, which would see every Bishop, every diocese and every religious order make available a legal entity, covered by insurance and wealth, that survivors of child sex abuse can sue, is a major change in the legal approach of some church bodies to litigation.
This has not always been the case and is the very hurdle John Ellis came up against when he attempted to sue the Archdiocese of Sydney.
The confusing structure of the Church, and previous legal cases, have often been a deterrent for survivors of child sex abuse to make a claim against the Church. This can no longer be the case. There must be a consistent, fair and equal approach across Australia for anybody, anywhere, who has been sexually abused as a child by the Church.
In the past the Catholic Church has been slow to act on issues of clerical child sex abuse, and placed the interest of the Church ahead of victims.
Our very real hope is that by making these changes survivors of child sex abuse will no longer feel thwarted by the Church. As in many other institutions, people wanting to take legal action against the Church for sexual abuse need to have their cases tested on the merits not denied because of a legal technical issue.
We want survivors to know if they go down the litigation path they won’t have to run up against any confusion, which effectively denies them an entity to sue.
In her opening address at this week’s hearing Gail Furness, senior council assisting the Royal Commission, quoted from Cardinal Pell’s witness statement to the Commission.
It was pleasing to hear the Cardinal say that in his view, despite the findings in the landmark Ellis case, he believes the Church in Australia should be able to be sued in cases of child sex abuse. This is a welcome response and consistent with proposals the Truth Justice and Healing Council (TJHC) has developed.
The TJHC has now put forward two reforms proposals that we hope will assist survivors find justice and begin a healing process.
The first is a National Compensation Scheme that involves an independent authority investigating and determining compensation, which would be paid by the Church or any other institution responsible for the abuse.
This second proposal, to ensure there is an entity within each diocese or congregation that can be sued, provides survivors with at the very least a starting point if they want to take legal action against the Church. This forms an important part of our Issues Paper, ‘Civil Litigation’ that we will submit to the Royal Commission at the end of this month.
[...]
This is a difficult time for everyone. We will not make excuses, or attempt any sort of spin. The only thing we can do is work harder, listen better and understand more.
Francis Sullivan
TJHC
The tears rolled down John Ellis’ face as he recounted the abuse he suffered as an altar boy in Bass Hill in Sydney in the mid 1970s. At the second Royal Commission hearing concerning Towards Healing in Sydney this week, Mr Ellis explained how his misery continued as he attempted, but failed, to sue the Church for justice.
Listening to Mr Ellis speak of his suffering and loss was distressing. It may be of small consolation to him, but his battle has played no small part in prompting the announcement this week of a major reform proposal within the Catholic Church.
The reform, which would see every Bishop, every diocese and every religious order make available a legal entity, covered by insurance and wealth, that survivors of child sex abuse can sue, is a major change in the legal approach of some church bodies to litigation.
This has not always been the case and is the very hurdle John Ellis came up against when he attempted to sue the Archdiocese of Sydney.
The confusing structure of the Church, and previous legal cases, have often been a deterrent for survivors of child sex abuse to make a claim against the Church. This can no longer be the case. There must be a consistent, fair and equal approach across Australia for anybody, anywhere, who has been sexually abused as a child by the Church.
In the past the Catholic Church has been slow to act on issues of clerical child sex abuse, and placed the interest of the Church ahead of victims.
Our very real hope is that by making these changes survivors of child sex abuse will no longer feel thwarted by the Church. As in many other institutions, people wanting to take legal action against the Church for sexual abuse need to have their cases tested on the merits not denied because of a legal technical issue.
We want survivors to know if they go down the litigation path they won’t have to run up against any confusion, which effectively denies them an entity to sue.
In her opening address at this week’s hearing Gail Furness, senior council assisting the Royal Commission, quoted from Cardinal Pell’s witness statement to the Commission.
It was pleasing to hear the Cardinal say that in his view, despite the findings in the landmark Ellis case, he believes the Church in Australia should be able to be sued in cases of child sex abuse. This is a welcome response and consistent with proposals the Truth Justice and Healing Council (TJHC) has developed.
The TJHC has now put forward two reforms proposals that we hope will assist survivors find justice and begin a healing process.
The first is a National Compensation Scheme that involves an independent authority investigating and determining compensation, which would be paid by the Church or any other institution responsible for the abuse.
This second proposal, to ensure there is an entity within each diocese or congregation that can be sued, provides survivors with at the very least a starting point if they want to take legal action against the Church. This forms an important part of our Issues Paper, ‘Civil Litigation’ that we will submit to the Royal Commission at the end of this month.
[...]
This is a difficult time for everyone. We will not make excuses, or attempt any sort of spin. The only thing we can do is work harder, listen better and understand more.
----- Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 7:18 PM
Subject: tav. Bisschop Frans Wiertz
Geachte Heer,
Hiermee verzoek ik U contact op te (laten) nemen
met de Heer ...., medewerker van uw bisdom.
Naar ik heb begrepen is de Heer .... die ik
verder niet ken en wiens naam ik niet onmogelijk foutief spel, secretaris van de
juridische afdeling van uw bisdom.
Ik had vanmiddag slechts een nogal uitgebreid
telefonisch contact met de Heer .... dit nadat ik door een
voorlichtingsmedewerker gezien mijn vraag naar de juridische afdeling werd
doorverwezen. Deze medewerker kon mij zelf niet doorverbinden daar ik via een 06
nummer naar hem doorgezet was.
Aanvankelijk zou ik verbonden worden met een
vrouwelijke juridisch medewerker, na 2x terugbellen zou ik bij de Heer ....
moeten zijn (?)
Mijn verzoek aan U is het gevolg van het mij
buitengewoon verontrustende gesprek dat ik vervolgens met de Heer ... had en
ik tenslotte een eind heb gemaakt.
De Heer ....heeft mij meerdere malen en in niet
mis te verstane bewoordingen laten weten dat door mijn telefoontje zijn kerst
c.q.de rest van het jaar volledig "verpest" (zijn woorden) was.
Dat spijt mij buitengewoon.
Uit het gesprek met de Heer ...., datgene wat hij
zei en zeker de wijze waarop hij dit deed was, behalve bijzonder verdrietig (en
dien overeenkomstig grof )
kan ik niet anders dan concluderen dat dit door de
Heer .... heel duidelijk zo ervaren emoties voortkomend uit diens, zoals hij
meedeelde de afgelopen 3 jaar opgedane ervaringen zijn.
Ik heb ons gesprek beeindigd.
Ik wens de Heer .... niet anders dan hele goede
dagen.
Van (historisch) (seksueel) misbruik zijn niet
slechts de historische slachtoffers slachtoffer.
Ik hoop van harte dat - en dat bepaald niet alleen
voor de Heer ... (en de zijnen) - u dan wel wie dan ook vanuit
uw organisatie de Heer .... datgene kan bieden waarop ook hij recht maar
vooral ook kennelijk ernstige behoefte heeft, mij
restte niet anders dan het gesprek beeindigen.
En mijn erkenning van de realiteit, bij deze dus
mijn verzoek daarom.
Met mijn dank.
Ik wens ook U goede dagen.
Met groet
woensdag, maart 12, 2014
dinsdag, maart 11, 2014
Petrus punthoofd "The archbishop said that we should all sin from time to time"
The National Committee for Professional Standards (NCPS) is a joint committee of Catholic Religious Australia (CRA) and the Australian Catholic Bishops.
The committee was established to oversee the development of policies, principles and procedures in responding to Church-related abuse complaints. The committee’s purpose is to ensure pastoral care for victims and survivors of sexual and physical abuse by church personnel.
It is responsible for developing professional standards among clergy, religious and lay church workers, both employees and volunteers.
[...]
bron
The committee was established to oversee the development of policies, principles and procedures in responding to Church-related abuse complaints. The committee’s purpose is to ensure pastoral care for victims and survivors of sexual and physical abuse by church personnel.
It is responsible for developing professional standards among clergy, religious and lay church workers, both employees and volunteers.
[...]
bron
taal en rekentests
fail·ure
Where there is a significant dispute about the facts,
or the accused is unavailable to give a response,
the matter shall be investigated in accordance
with the procedures set out ...
Shall we dance?
Yes ten o'clock tomorrow morning
maandag, maart 10, 2014
Case Study 8 Royal Commission to inquire into the Catholic Church and Towards Healing: de Ellis Defence:
zondag, maart 09, 2014
vrijdag, maart 07, 2014
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)
