zaterdag, februari 22, 2014

vrijdag, februari 21, 2014
































Vergilius '06, '07 of 2009?




dinsdag, februari 18, 2014

Steeds minder kinderen naar kinderopvang


bron





't















't was een prachtig affiche: een urm mét zonnehoed, emmertje en schep op het strand aan 't taartjes bakken met als tekst en als er nou 'ns oorlog kwam en we besloten dat we er niet heen gingen ?





weg

Salvation Army draws ire over award to accused child abuser

BRON







17-02-2014
Paul Bibby
Court Reporter

A Salvation Army officer accused of physically and sexually abusing dozens of young boys at a boys' home in south Sydney was given the army's silver star award at a function late last year, despite the allegations against him.

The organisation later celebrated the award in the January edition of its national magazine, on the eve of royal commission hearings that were told details of the horrific acts of abuse he and his colleagues allegedly had perpetrated. Major John McIver was awarded the silver star on December 1 by Commissioner Jan Condon in recognition of the fact that his two sons had become commissioned officers. All parents of officers in the Salvos are given the award, which ''recognises the influence of parents, and significant family and friends, on the lives of their officer children''.

Major McIver's award was then given special mention in the army's Pipeline magazine, which published a picture of him and his wife receiving the award and noting that the head of the army's eastern territory, Commissioner Condon, had attended the ceremony. The picture story was later quietly removed from the Salvation Army's website.

''It is incomprehensible to me how they could give someone an award who they knew had so many allegations of cruel and brutal treatment of children against him,'' the executive officer of abuse survivors group Care Leavers Australia Network, Leonie Sheedy, said.

The royal commission's recent public hearings into Salvation Army homes in NSW and Queensland heard that Major McIver was one of five officers who engaged in horrific physical and sexual abuse of boys in the 1950s, '60s and '70s.

Retired army officer and whistleblower Major Cliff Randall, told the hearing that Major McIver regularly whipped boys at the boys' home in Bexley, including flicking their testicles with a belt.
He recalled Major McIver going ''wild'' on one occasion when a boy offered token resistance to being whipped in this way. ''He went ballistic. He grabbed [the boy], threw him up against the wall, bruised all his face, dislocated his shoulder. That's when I stepped in,'' he said.

Major McIver allegedly refused to give the boy proper medical treatment, and instead placed a tennis ball under his armpit to ''pop the shoulder back in''.

It was revealed at the commission that, despite this alleged abuse, Major McIver was still a Salvation Army officer. The organisation eventually suspended him on January 30.
klik
On Sunday, the Salvation Army acknowledged that publicising the award to Major McIver was inappropriate.

''The Salvation Army does acknowledge that celebrating the silver star presentation publicly through Pipeline was insensitive and could be insulting to victims of child sexual abuse,'' a spokesman said. ''Major McIver was the focus of a confidential, internal investigation and the editorial team were rightly not aware of the investigation. It was not our intention to cause further distress.''

However, he defended the decision to give Major McIver the award. ''The silver star is not a service-recognition award. It is simply an acknowledgement of parents of new officers.''



  Ms Sheedy said granting the award showed the organisation ''still doesn't understand the long-term affects of sexual abuse on survivors''.




MEDIA RELEASE:
 
WOULD YOU TRUST THE CARE OF A CHILD OR AN ELDERLY PARENT TO THE SALVO’S…?

Paul Bibby’s article Salvation Army draws ire over award to accused child abuser (Sydney Morning Herald-17/2/14) surely raises a big question mark over the ‘fitness’ of the Salvation Army to be a provider of services to any vulnerable persons today.

How could it be that Major John McIver – guilty of horrendous acts of physical and sexual abuse of boys over decades – how could the Salvos be so insensitive and deceitful as to – even now – be acknowledging or promoting him in any way? McIver stole the lives of many boys, and the trauma of their abuse by him and other Salvation Army officers has cruelly affected them every day of their lives since then. McIver was – IS – a monster! Yet he was being celebrated at an event in December 2013 attended and spoken at by Salvation Army Commissioner James Condon (who cried at the Royal Commission when shamefully acknowledging the truth of the Army’s abuse of children in their care just the other week), and then with a proud photo in the Salvation Army press just last month!!

CLAN Executive Officer, Ms Leonie Sheedy said, “Our members are truly sickened by the continuing insensitivity and lack of moral judgement shown by the Salvation Army leadership. How can they be trusted and funded by governments to run services for vulnerable children and the elderly, when, out of the public glare, they can just seemingly forget the truth and celebrate their own – no matter how appallingly and criminally they have acted? And maybe the Salvation Army – and the Police, for that matter – can explain to the many struggling, care leaver abuse victims, why persons like McIver continue to be celebrated, rather than rotting in a gaol?

Ms Sheedy concluded, “This is an appalling revelation. We at CLAN loudly urge any government or department funding the Salvation Army to deliver services to vulnerable populations to immediately review and/or suspend these contracts until they can be 100% satisfied that there is no danger of any further abuse being committed at Salvation Army run services.”

MEDIA INQUIRIES:
Leonie Sheedy – Executive Officer of CLAN

zaterdag, februari 15, 2014

heren ik kots van U!

Burgemeester Leiden: huisvesting Benno L. is plicht

15-2-2014

Alle gemeenten in Nederland moeten hun best doen om zedendelinquenten die hun straf hebben uitgezeten, aan onderdak te helpen. Dat stelt de Leidse burgemeester Henri Lenferink. Zaterdag werd bekend dat pedoseksueel Benno L. sinds kort in Leiden woont.
Gevoelig
Volgens Lenferink zal de ex-zwemleraar niet langer dan een jaar in zijn stad wonen. Daarna wil hij verhuizen naar familie in het buitenland. Lenferink zegt dat hij het besluit om L. te huisvesten zorgvuldig heeft afgewogen, al beseft hij dat het onderbrengen van zedendelinquenten gevoelig ligt.

Onoplosbaar probleem
,,Wanneer alle burgemeesters nee zouden zeggen, zouden we met een onoplosbaar probleem zitten. Dat vind ik niet acceptabel. Daarom ben ik van mening dat alle gemeenten in Nederland een bijdrage zouden moeten leveren aan de oplossing van dit vraagstuk.”

Bewuste keuze
Lenferink heeft er bewust voor gekozen de buurtgenoten van L. niet te waarschuwen dat hij daar zou komen wonen. ,,Er rust een taboe op het huisvesten van zedendelinquenten en dat is de reden dat ik de buurt niet vooraf heb geïnformeerd. Ik heb ervoor gekozen om de huisvesting van de heer L. in het begin niet met de omwonenden en anderen in de stad te delen, om zo in alle rust ervaring op te doen en te kijken hoe de situatie verloopt." Nu het nieuws naar buiten is gekomen, zal Lenferink met omwonenden persoonlijk in gesprek gaan. Hij zegt graag van hen te horen hoe zij tegen de situatie aankijken.


bron

Volkskrant
15-2-2014


Het kostte Jan Poot miljoenen euro's en jaren werk, maar vorige maand kreeg de hoogbejaarde vastgoedmiljonair zijn zin. Althans voorlopig: er komt een uitgebreid strafrechterlijk onderzoek naar de oud-topambtenaar Joris Demmink. De voormalige secretaris-generaal van het ministerie van Justitie wordt beschuldigd van de verkrachting van twee Turkse jongens in de jaren negentig.
Het is de uitkomst van een al jaren durend steekspel. Met aan de ene kant ministers van Justitie en het Openbaar Ministerie die keer op keer zeggen dat er geen bewijs is voor de beschuldigingen. En aan de andere kant de anti-Demminklobby die overtuigd is van een doofpot en deze open probeert te wrikken met een internationale campagne, juridische procedures en publicaties.
Spin in het anti-Demminkweb, en financierm is Jan Poot (89)
Vader van zes, grootvader van twintig. Zonder hem, zegt hij, was de tegenstand nooit zo ver gekomen.
Behalve een landende groene specht , zijn ook zoon Peter en communicatieadviseur Jaap Sluis aanwezig

Toine Heijmans en Elisabeth Stoker: 

"Ik heb een opdracht"

Waar komt die vandaan?
Die komt van boven. Niet van beneden"

Is het een goddelijke opdracht?
"Vind ik wel, ja"

Wat houdt die in?
"Joris Demmink beschadigt Nederland. Hij is de reden dat Nederland zich economisch niet goed kan ontwikkelen. De pedofilie is bijkomend. Daar gaat het me niet om." 

En dat houdt u dag en nacht bezig
"Ja"

Hoeveel geld heeft de campagne tegen Demmink u al gekost?
"Miljoenen. Vorig jaar was ik 4 miljoen euro kwijt." Even later: "Het precieze bedrag weet ik niet, maar de voortdurende strijd tegen rechtsmisbruik loopt in de miljoenen.".

Waar gaat dat geld aan op?
Aan mensen die de zaken voor me regelen. Waar het precies aan op gaat, weet ik niet. Het interesseert me ook niet. Ik wil gewoon dat het geregeld wordt."

Die 4 miljoen betaalt u aan...
"... degenen die ervoor werken. De heer Robert Rubinstein van de stichting de Roestige Spijker heeft er samen met lobbyisten voor gezorgd dat er een hoorzitting in het Amerikaanse Congres is gehouden over Demmink. Advocaat Mathijs Kaaks heeft ervoor gezorgd dat er begin maart in de Utrechtse rechtbank voor het eerst in het openbaar getuigen gehoord werden over Demmink. Advocaat Adele van der Plas, die de twee Turkse jongens bijstaat,  betaal ik niet. Maar ik heb wel haar reis naar naar het Amerikaans Congres betaald, net als die van de Nederlandse jongen die misbruikt is door Demmink en die van oud rechercheur Klaas Langendoen."

Als u zich er niet mee had bemoeid, was er dan niks gebeurd in dit dossier?

vrijdag, februari 14, 2014

woensdag, februari 12, 2014

war cry; Invitation to Julia Gillard Dear Andre, James, and Peter (Or: Come You Masters of War)

Posted on February 12, 2014


Dear Andre Cox, Peter Farthing, and James Condon,

It has been 12 days now since my father died. Twelve days since I found his poor, broken body, sitting like Buddha, in our living room when I woke, briefly and unusually happy at the recollection of his pleasure at the previous day’s events, only to go into shock at the impossibility of what I was seeing when I emerged from my room.

Twelve days since I screamed and pleaded for an hour for him to please, please wake up. Twelve days of being unable to think clearly. But I’m thinking clearly now, so please take the time to understand me and read what I have to say. Dad truly believed that he was finally going to achieve justice for his family, and that we’d all finally be able to be in a secure and happy place for once in our damned lives. I cannot and never will be able to get over what your organisation has done to him, but the only solace I take in keeping on keeping on despite the pain is that somewhere out there, he knows that I’m continuing his fight, and when he comes back to check in on us from his latest trip to Centaurus, or wherever he’s busy exploring, he can feel good about what is happening to us.

Several organisations and individuals have been in contact with you regarding reparations for the severe damage your organisation inflicted upon him and his consequent ‘psychological death’, which resulted in his lifetime of poverty and despair, and a lifetime of poverty and despair for his family. I have been told by many that your organisation has agreed in principle to reparations in conversations with such people, but not one of you has told me (or any member of my family) of such. You have made no approach to our family in furtherance of what you have been recently referring to as your “restorative justice approach” (did you lift that expression from Dad’s site – http://lewisblayse.net/about-2/ ?).

Perhaps you’ve been giving us ‘space’ to grieve?

If so, I can tell you now that I will never stop grieving for a life stolen far, far too soon. A life taken because of the accumulated toll of the disabilities your organisation ensured he had to live with. Disabilities that not only prevented him from achieving the very great heights he should have achieved, but that resulted in a miserable, deprived life, punctuated only briefly by moments of joy that in themselves were painful because they were so obviously transitory. Through your organisation’s actions and its failure over decades to make up for what it did to him, it ensured he lived a life that placed such great pressure on his health that he was taken from us far, far, far too early.

Through your organisation’s almost complete lack of concern for his welfare, it also created disabilities that meant that the family who loved my father so hopelessly and utterly deeply felt daily in our bodies and our minds the pain he endured. We will never stop feeling this pain. I especially will never forget the years I have spent crying or stunned in helpless rage at my inability to make his suffering go away, at his humiliating life of poverty, and at having to watch him fail, over and over again, to overcome the consequences of his multiple abuses. Every year, the damage has compounded, and it did so for more than 50 years. It continues to compound as his family lives on. And it continues to compound in the struggling and pain-wrecked families of your organisation’s many other victims.

I think you have no comprehension of what it really feels like to feel “disturbed.”

Do forgive my scepticism, but I have waited too long and I have lost all patience. I’d like to believe you’re giving us ‘space’, but after 12 days of silence, I am more inclined to believe that you’re just waiting for this all to blow over. I’m sure you have the very best crisis management team that money can buy. Perhaps you’re all sitting around feeling pleased with yourselves at your stellar performances over the last couple of weeks? I’ll give it to you, it was pretty good. Yeah, I also remember all too well how your reputation survived intact after the 2003 airing of ‘The Homies’ (go ‘Team Salvos’!), and I’m sure your PR company is being very reassuring right now. You may like to get a second opinion on that one, though, because I assure you that there is an ever-growing chorus of voices who know the truth, and they will continue to speak out.

I do hope you had a nice break over the Christmas / New Year period, because I predict that you’re in for a year of pretty stressful crisis management activities. Do take the time to care of yourselves. Eat well. Relax as much as possible. Maybe fit in a couple of trips to the Bahamas if you can? It’s not going to be easy. I may be just one voice, but please be assured that I will never stop agitating until my father, through his surviving family, achieves true restorative justice for what your organisation did to him and what you did to us. I almost feel sorry for you.

But I will tell you that I’m sick of listening to your sophisticated spin. From where I’m standing, and from where I’ve stood all my life, it seems to me that your reputation is all that matters to you, no matter what you say. Your reputation, after all, is your source of your staggering wealth, isn’t it? Your tremendous and carefully nurtured reputation allows you to do sweetheart deals with organisations that pay you massive sums for a little bit of your glossy, well-crafted reputation to place on their websites and advertising materials, not aware of the truth. Your reputation leads millions of kind-hearted but ignorant souls to give generously to your organisation and its ‘good works’. In your own words, you’re “one of the most trusted brands” out there. Congratulations.

Oh yes, you say now your reputation matters not a bit, and that the Salvation Army “no longer considers its reputation a priority.” Yes, you say now that you’ve just now figured out that your previous approaches were “flawed.” I know, though, that you’ve said the same old stuff before, and your organisation’s many, many victims have not forgotten that either, even if most everyone else has.

Stuff your glib statements about your new approach. From where I’m standing, I see no evidence of it being true. You know full well that your organisation was approached by our family years before the 2003 airing of ‘The Homies’, and we were ignored. You know full well that your organisation was exposed for its abuses in earlier enquiries. You know full well that you waited a very long time after ‘The Homies’ was aired to throw my father the pennies you provided to a desperate and humiliated man in no position to do anything but take the pittance you offered. You know full well that you’ve had nearly a fortnight to approach my family and deliver justice, but have failed to do so.

Andre, James, Peter, I am not going to “come forward.” You know who I am, and you know who my father was. It is for you to come to me. It is for you to come to me and tell me what my father’s life was worth. And if you can’t figure it out for yourselves, perhaps you might like to consult with some of the “incredibly large team of people” working under you? Perhaps somewhere in your organisation’s ranks there is someone who truly understands, because I really don’t think you do.
It’s not “too late” now to finally do the right thing. Give it a try. You might find it feels good.

Aletha Blayse

dinsdag, februari 11, 2014

Thanks giving; Message to Australia and Thank You card

klik

follow on Twitter







To date the Royal Commission has held over 1,000 private sessions. Many of those sessions were facilitated by stakeholders such as yourselves.

Many individuals who have attended private sessions have wanted to commemorate their experience in some way.

From 2014, the Chair of the Royal Commission, Justice Peter McClellan, will offer people who have attended a private session a thank you card and invite anyone who has shared their story at a private session to provide a ‘Message to Australia’. There are more details on these two initiatives below.

From 10 February 2014, people attending a private session will receive a ‘thank you’ pack at the end of their private session.

If you, or an individual you have helped, attended a private session during 2013 and would like to receive a thank you card or provide your ‘Message to Australia’, please call the Royal Commission on 1800 099 340 or email us on the address below.

Thank You card
We are enormously grateful to all those who have come forward, and helped others to come forward, to tell their story to the Royal Commission in a private session, and, as a gesture of our appreciation for your contribution, we would like to provide all attendees with a signed ‘thank you’ card.

Message to Australia

The Royal Commission is making a book called ‘Message to Australia’. The book will be made up of messages from people who have attended a private session.

It is an opportunity for people who have attended a private session to send a simple message to the Australian community about their experience of institutional child sexual abuse and their hopes for creating a safer environment for children in the future.

At the end of the Royal Commission, the book will be kept at the National Library of Australia, where it will be available to members of the public and preserved for future generations. Please call 1800 099 340 or email us to have a message included.

For specific stakeholder enquiries or to request a thank you card please email us at stakeholders@childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au



 
 follow on Twitter | friend on Facebook | forward to a friend 
Copyright © 2014 Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, All rights reserved.

maandag, februari 10, 2014

Voor Marijke










Dit is uit een van de schrijfschriftjes  uit wat ik denk dat ook toen jouw klas was?

Royal Commission 10 - 2 - 2014







webcast live
















"apart from Indonesia...."

 Ja mijnheer de Voorzitter, wij hebben een communicatieprobleem

Click
 
KLIk     


Klak 




niks noppes nada
niks noppes nada



Prachtige woorden, transparant  en we are sorry internationaal verspreid

thee met donuts
Da's Coetzee ook! 


The tears have come too late…
 CLAN

It was too little, too late for many Care Leavers watching the Salvation Army Commissioner, James Condon, crying about the monstrous abuse inflicted on children by the Salvation Army, as reported at the Royal Commission hearing on Monday 10 February 2014. Where was this concern and where was their duty of care during the decades that this abuse was rampant?

CLAN President, Mr Jim Luthy stated that, “The incorrect impression may have been given by the Salvation Army at yesterday’s hearing that I have been working closely with the Salvation Army in my capacity as CLAN President. This is not the case.  Any contact I have had with the Salvation Army has only been in my own professional capacity and as a Care Leaver who spent time in Salvation Army Homes for boys.  CLAN remains very disappointed by the lack of acknowledgement, contrition, and compensation offered by the Salvation Army to its many victims.”

And why has it taken so long for Salvation Army to publicly acknowledge their awful history of abuse that ruined countless young lives and has resulted in a lifetime of misery or premature death for so many of the abuse victims?

CLAN Executive Officer, Ms Leonie Sheedy went on to say, “Our members continue to be traumatised by the re-living of the abuse that the Royal Commission is hearing.  When the public spotlight has been focused on them, the Salvos have finally begun to acknowledge their abuse, even though they cannot explain why it has taken until this hearing to do so, or why they haven’t previously acted to punish and remove all perpetrators from within their ranks. So now, let’s see if they will ensure their victims are decently compensated for the loss of their lives that resulted from this abuse, or whether it has just been a show of crocodile tears”.



The Guardian
AAP

The Salvation Army is willing to discuss being part of a national redress scheme for victims of child sexual and physical abuse in its homes.
Commissioner James Condon, head of the army’s eastern territory, told the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse it already had a People First redress program in place.
However, he said the Salvation Army would take part in talks on a national scheme, proposed by the Catholic and Anglican churches.
“We are more than prepared to enter into dialogue regarding that,” Condon told the hearing in Sydney on Monday in reply to a question from commission chair Justice Peter McClellan.

The commission has heard the Salvation Army has unreservedly apologised to victims of abuse.

But Condon said there were still victims who found it difficult to approach the Salvation Army.

“There are people in the hearing room here who find it difficult to see the [Salvation Army] uniform and that makes me sad”, he said.
“We invite all who were harmed to get in touch with us”.

Justice McClellan asked if the Salvation Army would accept legal responsibility for illegal acts.

In the past two weeks, the commission has heard accounts of sexual and physical abuse by Salvation Army officers at four boys’ homes in NSW and Queensland. They include the Bexley home for boys in south Sydney and the Gill Memorial Home in Goulburn as well as the Alkira home in Indooroopilly and a training farm in Riverview, Queensland.
Condon replied: “Yes, we will accept that responsibility”.

However, the Salvation Army was set up as a charitable trust and did not employ its officers, leaving open the question of liability.
This is also the situation with the Catholic and Anglican churches, which have disputed liability when it comes to compensating victims.

Justice McClellan asked if the Salvation Army’s insurer would prevent it from accepting responsibility.
Condon said he would need to get more information.

Earlier on Monday, Condon said the Salvation Army would not contest liability if victims came forward.
Of 157 abuse claims made in the past 10 to 12 years, 133 resulted in ex-gratia payments and six claimants received apologies and counselling help. Eight were rejected after investigations and some claimants lost contact.

The Salvation Army no longer runs children’s homes in Australia but is involved in foster care services and events, such as summer camps for underprivileged children.

The transparency of its redress program, which requires abuse survivors to sign a deed of release, has been questioned.

Justice McClellan asked why those receiving compensation were required to stay silent on the amount.

Condon said it was put in place to stop people comparing abuse and payouts.

He said the organisation’s personal standards office, which carried out basic investigations, had a formula to calculate payouts although this information was not available to victims.

Pressed on the issue of transparency by the commission, Condon said: “I am happy to look at that”.


The Australian
Head of Salvos 'is sickened' 


THE international head of the Salvation Army has written to the royal commission saying he was sickened by the revelations of widespread and brutal child sex abuse within the Christian organisation in Australia.
At least 157 men claim to have been physically and sexually abused while living at boys' homes run by the army in NSW and Queensland, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has heard.

In what may be an unprecedented scandal in its international history, 23 men have been identified as alleged abusers, 19 of whom were officers or envoys of the Salvation Army itself.


In a personal letter to the commission chairman, Peter McClellan, the army's London-based General Andre Cox said he has "been sickened by much of the harrowing evidence presented" to the hearing.


"I still struggle to comprehend that these acts were perpetrated by Salvation Army officers," he said in the letter, tendered to the commission yesterday. General Cox, who has ultimate authority for the army's roughly 1.1 million soldiers, has also revised the organisation's child protection policies and written to every commanding officer in 126 countries about the commission's hearing.


This letter, sent on the day the current hearing began, directs Salvation Army personnel to review and enforce their own disciplinary procedures "to ensure no abuse of any kind is taking place."


"You will be very much aware of the fact that the royal commission is now under way in Australia . . . I am disturbed to the very depth of my being by what I am reading in these days," the letter said.


Giving evidence yesterday, the commander of the Salvation Army's Eastern Territory of Queensland, NSW and the ACT openly wept while offering an unreserved apology for what he called the organisation's "greatest failure".


"Evil and damaged people were able to get away with child sexual abuse for too long," Commissioner James Condon told the commission, and the result was "a betrayal . . . of everything the Salvation Army was meant to be".


Poor recruitment and oversight of those working at the homes allowed the brutal treatment to take place, Commissioner Condon said, and "we are sorry, deeply sorry for every instance when children were sexually abused."


The army was willing to discuss setting up a national redress scheme with power to decide how much compensation churches and other organisations provide to victims of child abuse, he said.


Both the Anglican and Catholic churches have previously suggested they, too, would support the proposal, which is increasingly seen as one of the key considerations facing the commission. "There are lots of reasons we would support it and we want to enter into dialogue regarding it," Commissioner Condon said.


"Well, that dialogue will take place further down the track," Justice McClellan replied.