Shanley lost the appeal in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT SJC NO. 10382AC NO. 2007-P-0886 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Appellee v. PAUL SHANLEY, Appellant ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT BRIEF OF THE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL AS AMICUS CURIAE
excerpts
This Brief explains why Appellant’s position is wholly inaccurate regarding scientific acceptance of dissociative memory loss and why his Court’s determination that testimony on dissociative memory loss and recovery, from an otherwise qualified expert, is admissible without a Lanigan hearing, is correct. See Commonwealth v. Frangipane, 433Mass. 527, 537-538 (2001)….
Niet in een dure psychoanalyse, maar een door NUON gesponserd avondje Cruyffacademie op de keukenhof !
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten